Decision، pp.، distance، factors، environmental، industrial

lls, Environ Geol, 51, pp.797-811.

  • Gomes, E and Estellitalins, M, 2002, Integration Geographical Information Systems and Multi Criteria Methods: A Case study, Annals of Operation Research, 116 , PP. 243-269.
  • Heywood I; S. Cornelius and S. Carver. 2006, An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems.Third Edition. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow,Essex.
  • Hien LE thi thu, 2009, Application GIS on environmental zoning and management(Case study in Sontay, Hanoi, Vietnam), 7th FIG Regional Conference Spatial Data Serving People: Land Governance and the Environment Building the CapacityHanoi, Vietnam, 19-22 October.
  • Malczewski: “GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis”, John Wiley & sons, 1999.
  • Jiang, H. and J.R. Eastman 2000, Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria valuation in International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2):173–184.
  • Kao, J. and H. Lin 1996, Multifactor spatial analysis for landfill siting. Journal of Environmental Engineering, V:122, N:1, pp.902-908.
  • Kapur, A. and Graedel, T. E. (2004) , Industrial ecology.” Encyclopedia of Energy, 3, PP. 373–382.
  • Kaye D. 1968, Boolean System. Longmans, Green & Co Ltd.
  • Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
  • Kiker, G, Bridges, T, Varghese, A, Seager, T, Likov, I, 2005, Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmetal Decision Making, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1, pp. 95-108.
  • Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P. and Hokkanen, J., 2000, “Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management”, Environmental Management, 26, No. 6, pp. 595-605.
  • LEE, S., 2001, A Spatial Decision Support System for Guiding the Selection of Tourism Development Sites, Texas A&M University.
  • Linkov, I, Satterstorm, F, K, Kiker, G, Seager, T, P, Bridges, T, Gardner, K, H, Rogers, S, H, Belluck, D, A, Meyer, A, 2006, Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Compehensive Decision Approach for Management of Contaminated Sediments, Risk analysis,26, pp.61-78.
  • Malczewski J. 1999, GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.
  • Malczewski J. 2004, GIS-based Land-use Suitability Analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, 62(1) , pp. 3–65.
  • Malczewski, j. 2006. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS- based multi criteria evaluation for land- use suitability analysis.International of applied earth observation and geo information, 8:270-277.
  • Massam, B. H., 1988, Multi-criteria decision making techniques in planning, planning Program, 30, No., pp. 1-89.
  • Mendoza, G, Martins, H, 2006, Multicriteria Decision Analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms, Forest Ecology and management, 230, pp.1-22.
  • مطلب مرتبط با این موضوع :  کودک، والدین، اضطراب، تأملی، احتمالاً، تحول، ناایمن، خشم، نیات، تهدید، بزرگسالان، .سرانجام
  • Moriarty BM,1983, Hierachies of cities and the spetial filtering of industrial development, regional science associstion,industrial city site selection and environmental effects of paper of selected site on arak city.
  • Pirdashti, M., Ghadei, A., Mohammadi, M. and Shojatalab, G., 2009, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Selection Model with Application to Chemical Engineering Management Decisions”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 49, No., pp. 54-59.
  • Pirdashti, M., Omidi, M. and Pirdashti, H., 2009, An AHP-Delphi Multi-Criteria Usage Cases Model with Application to Citrogypsum Decisions, Case Study: Kimia Gharb Gostar Industries Company, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 49, No., pp. 60-66.
  • Prakash, T. N; 2003, Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy MultiCriteria Decision Making Approach, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Observation.
  • Ramanathan, R., 2001, A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment, Journal of Environmental Management, 63, No. 1, pp. 27-35.
  • Ruiz Puente, C, Diego, M, Ortiz, J, Hemando, M, Hernaez, P, 2007, The Development Of A New Methodology Based On GIS And Fuzzy Logic To Locate Sustainable Industrial Areas, 10th AGILE International Conference On Geographic Information, pp, 1-8, Denmark.
  • Ryu, Y. S., 2005, Development of Usability Questionnaires for Electronic Mobile Products and Decision Making Methods, Virginia, Blacksburg, 195 pages.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp. 231-281.
  • Sadoddin, A., Sheikh, V., R., M. and M. GH., H., 2010, Analysis of Vegetation-based managment scenarios using. MCDM in the Ramian watershed, Golestan, Iran, International Journal of Plant Production, 4, No. 1, pp.52-62.
  • Saghafian, S. and Hejazi, S. R., 2005, “Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Using A Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS Procedure”, Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, Vienna, Austria.
  • Smith, D. M. 1971, Industrial location: an economic geographical analysis. 1st John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Store, R. and Kangas, J; 2001, Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling, Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, No. 2, pp. 79-93.
  • Svoray, T; Pua, B. and Tsafra, B; 2005, Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism, Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 72, No; pp. 337–351.
  • مطلب مرتبط با این موضوع : 
  • N. Prakash: “Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria
  • Vatalis, K. and Manoliadis, O., 2002, A two-level multicriteria DSS for landfill site selection using GIS: Case study in Western Macedonia, Greece, journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 6, No. 1, pp. 56-49.
  • Wood, L. and Dragicevic, S., 2007, “GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation and Fuzzy Sets to Identify Priority Sites for Marine Protection”, Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, No. 9, pp. 2539-2558.
  • Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P., 1999 Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B 29, 141–150.
  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W. and Poh, K. L., 2006, Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update, Energy, 31, No. 14, pp. 2604-2622.
  • Zhu, X. and Dale, A. P., 2001, JavaAHP: a web-based decision analysis tool for natural resource and environmental management, Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, No. 3, pp. 251-262.
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Abstract:

    Finding place for industrial sites is a critical factor in regions planning and management with regard to environmental and economical consequences. Since sites factors are diverse and extensive, it is necessary to choose suitable factors to reach the best results. Final sites should at least cover all required factors and roles. Sustainable development need a novel method for planning and establishing industrial sites to minimize the negative environmental effects resulted from industries generation and utilization. In this study, eight factors including slope, distance from the transit roads, distance from rivers, distance from residential regions, land uses, protected areas, distance from faults, and distance from dry rivers were chosen and used to evaluate industrial town sites of Kohgiloye and boyer ahmad province. Data layers of factors were imported to GIS environment. To standardize the factors using the Bolin mind, standardized layers were first overlaid by union function; and industries fitness map was then provided. In the next step, factors standardization was done by fuzzy functions. Layer weighting was done by pair method. Constraining layers i.e. distance from faults, distance from dry rivers, and protected areas were finally standardized by using the Bolin mind. Slope, distance from the transit roads, distance from rivers, distance from residential regions, land uses layers were standardized by using fuzzy functions. The layers were overlaid using linear weighting combination equation in GIS environment and the establishment suitability map was resulted.

    مطلب مرتبط با این موضوع :  نفعان، رقابتی، شرکای، معماری، هدفگذاری، راهبرد

    The results of Bolin overlay showed that there are 20 suitable patches for industries establishment that are located in the southern and eastern parts of the region. The results of weighting combination method indicated that 5.5% of the region has the high suitability for industries establishment. Overlaying positions map of established industrial towns with Bolin resulted map showed that industrial towns of Kohgiloye and boyer ahmad province are located on unsuitable sites. Also the map resulted from linear weighting combination showed that none of the province industrial towns are located on high suitability sites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Key words: Finding Place for Industrial Sites; Fuzzy Method; Weighted Linear Combination Method; Hieratical Analysis; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Kohgiloye and Boyerahmad Province.

     

    ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY

    Hamedan Branch

    Faculty of Basic Sciences-Department of the Environment

    Thesis for receiving «M.Sc» degree on Environmental Sciences

     

    Subject:

    Environmental Evaluation of Industrial Estates Site Selection (Case Study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad Province, Iran)

     

    Supervisor:

    Dr. S. M. Monavari

     

    Consulting Advisor:

    Dr. S. Sobhan Ardekani

     

    By:

    Seyed Saeed Mohaghegh

    summer 2012

    1- Pull

    2- Push

    3- Noxious Location Models

    4- Balancing

    1- Non-compensatory Model

    1- Compensatory Model

    2- Keeney

    3- Raiffa

    1- Risto

    1- Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

    2- Thomas L. Saaty

    1- Multi Attribute Decision Analysis (MADA)

    2- Importance

    3- Likelihood

    4- Preference

    5- Reciprocal Axiom

    6- Homogeneity Axiom

    1- Pair Wise Comparison (PWC)

    1- Unity

    1- Complexity

    2- Interdependence

    3- Hierarchy Structuring

    4- Measurement

    5- Inconsistency

    6- Synthesis

    7- Trade-offs

    8- Process Repetition

     

     

    [23]– Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

    [24]– Sontay

     

     1-Tiantai

    1- Quercus persica

    [27]– Spatial Data Modeler (SDM)